>
> Andrew Venikov wrote:
>
>> in c++0x it will be possible to use lambda functions.
>>
>> So, for example, this:
>>
>> [](int n) { return n+ 1; }
>>
>> Will become valid c++.
>>
>> Unfortunately it breaks current C++ highlighting.
>> After a line like the one above, all curly brackets will be highlighted by VIM as "unmatched", making reading the code really hard.
>>
>> Is there a quick way to fix that?
>
> You can vote for the C++ standard to not add things like this to make
> the language even more cryptic.
>
> Well, perhaps that's not a quick way, but it will make programmers who
> try to decipher C++ programs a lot more sane.
:) Quotable quote. I like this response, having spent many hours
trying to decrypt a C++ code base that has template-based functional
programming..
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment