Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Re: A short question about gVim

Hi Tony :)

2011/2/1 Tony Mechelynck <antoine.mechelynck@gmail.com>:
> On 01/02/11 11:27, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
>> I'm lost in Windows, I must confess...
>
> The "unofficial reference" for Vim on Windows is the "Vim without Cream"
> distribution, downloadable from http://sourceforge.net/projects/cream/files/
> (click "Vim") and maintained by Steve Hall;

THANKS! Looks like it is *exactly* what I need :) I thought that Steve
only maintained the Cream version, so I didn't even look at it.

> Or you could, of course, compile your own version, keeping the sources
> up-to-date with Mercurial or TortoiseHg (which is a GUI interface to
> Mercurial for use on Windows), then following
> http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/vim/compile.htm -- but considering
> Steve's excellent distribution, this is only necessary if you want a
> different (probably smaller) featureset than the one he chose to include.

I was tempted to build my own version, as I do on Ubuntu, but setting
up a building environment in Windows is much more time-consuming than
doing the same in Ubuntu (where "time" is almost-zero). It is just not
worth the pain, and the precompiled version will work for me, I'm
sure.

Thanks a lot, Tony, you saved me a ton of time :)

--
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

No comments:

Post a Comment