> On Jul 29, 7:10 pm, sc wrote:
> > On Friday, July 29, 2011 11:19:34 Steve Sullivan wrote:
>
> > (i've since stopped using netrw, but the
> > principle applies)
> There's a replacement for netrw? Great!What? How?
> When I build vim 7.3 from source, netrw is built in.
> It's not even an option. When I type :e .
> up comes netrw. I'd be glad for a better replacement!
NERD_tree
http://vim.sourceforge.net/scripts/script.php?script_id=1658
A lot of people seem to think it's a lot better than netrw. I tried
it for a while but personally didn't like it as well as netrw, so I
went back to using netrw. For me, netrw "just works" without having
to think about it. YMMV.
Regards,
Gary
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment