Re: Update on my search for a radhat VIM

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:45 -0500, Steve Hall wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Reid Thompson <Reid.Thompson@ateb.com> wrote:

> These are ancient. Is there any reason the standard current Fedora
> releases wouldn't work?
>
> http://mirrors.servercentral.net/fedora/releases/16/Everything/i386/os/Packages/
>
> Packages:
>
> vim-X11-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm
> vim-clustershell-1.5.1-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
> vim-common-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm
> vim-enhanced-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm
> vim-filesystem-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm
> vim-latex-1.8.23-2.20101027.r1112.fc15.noarch.rpm
> vim-latex-doc-1.8.23-2.20101027.r1112.fc15.noarch.rpm
> vim-minimal-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm
> vim-perl-support-4.13-2.fc16.noarch.rpm
> vim-perl-tt2-0.1.3-3.fc15.noarch.rpm
> vim-vimoutliner-0.3.4-14.fc15.noarch.rpm
>
> Still not the most current, but 7.3.315 is years newer than 7.0.109.
>
> --
> Steve Hall [ digitect dancingpaper com ]
>

potentially it could not work due to missing newer dependencies.
Has current fedora switched to gtk3 yet?
Are they using the same version of libc?
etc

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php