>contains the '>' at the beginning, but since nesting is allowed
>(:set comments includes n:>), Vim insert the same amount of comment
>leaders at the beginning of the line as on the previous line.
I don't know what you mean by 'nesting is allowed', but this seems like
something that could be fixed so that it would "just work". (I know, it's
a very minor problem, and someone would have to carefully read the text
to figure out why it seemed that the quoting was "wrong" in this case, since
one of the quote chars is a > symbol intended that way.)
and of course, the "real solution" would be to use format=flowed, but the
same people who argue that probably argue against using a text based editor
too.
--
Answer: Because it makes conversations flow in a nonsensical order.
Question: Why is top-posting wrong? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette]
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment