>>> filetype=asciidoc
>>> Last set from /etc/vim/ftdetect/asciidoc_filetype.vim
>>>
>>> what is that /etc/vim/ folder doing here?
>>>
>>> runtimepath=~/.vim,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles,/usr/share/vim/vim73,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/after,~/.vim/after
> :scriptnames
> 1: /usr/share/vim/vimrc
> 2: /usr/share/vim/vim73/syntax/syntax.vim
> 3: /usr/share/vim/vim73/syntax/synload.vim
> 4: /usr/share/vim/vim73/syntax/syncolor.vim
> 5: /usr/share/vim/vim73/filetype.vim
> 6: /home/ping/.vim/ftdetect/csv.vim
> 7: /home/ping/.vim/ftdetect/mkd.vim
> 8: /home/ping/.vim/ftdetect/myft.vim
> 9: /home/ping/.vim/ftdetect/taskpaper.vim
> 10: /etc/vim/ftdetect/asciidoc_filetype.vim <-----------
> ***the file right before it:
> 9: /home/ping/.vim/ftdetect/taskpaper.vim
In this case, we don't want the file just before it, but the one a few
files back: /usr/share/vim/vim73/filetype.vim has clearly issued
:runtime! which is sourcing all scripts in the ftdetect subdirectory of
each directory in runtimepath, as a bunch of unrelated files under
ftdetect are being sourced.
Indeed the filetype.vim distributed with vim does include the command
:runtime! ftdetect/*.vim
So, either:
- runtimepath was different when filetype.vim was loaded. You can have a
good guess about this by giving giving :verbose runtimepath? and
checking whether it was set by a script before or after filetype.vim
in the :scriptnames list.
- more likely, one of the directories or subdirectories in your runtime
path is symlinked (or possibly but probably not hardlinked) to
something in /etc/vim. It's not /usr/share/vim/vim73, because that is
appearing in :scriptnames as itself, but there's a good chance that
/usr/share/vim/vimfiles is symlinked (or hardlinked) to /etc/vim. That
would fit nicely with some distributions' policies of putting
user-written/mutable configuration files under /etc but distributed
static configuration/support files under /usr. (It comes up as the
real path rather than the path in runtimepath presumably because Vim
does realpath() on the files so that duplicates are correctly
identified and script-local scope can work reliably.)
Hope this helps,
Ben.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment