On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:48:13 PM UTC+2, toothpik wrote:
> I don't either, and we are not alone.  There's at least one other
> person who finds that redundant, distracting current line number a
> nuisance.  His complaint was that it makes the number column much
> wider than it needs to be when you're far down in a large file.  Mine
> is that it's distracting and ugly.
> 
> I'm sorry I wasn't really paying attention when this addition to
> relativenumber was being first discussed.
You have my vote too.
The single absolute number isn't useful to me as I have a statusline
with that information. What's bothering me though is that it's an
aesthetic irregularity, an irritation that distracts from the sidelines.
To my eyes it _looks_ like a bug!
I'd very much prefer the old tidy line of right-aligned numbers.
> If nobody wants yet another option, maybe a configuration option?
I have an idea.
    'nonumber'      'number'        'nonumber'      'number'
    'nornu'         'nornu'         'rnu'           'rnu'
   |apple          |  1 apple      |  2 apple      |  2 apple
   |pear           |  2 pear       |  1 pear       |  1 pear
   |nobod[y]       |  3 nobod[y]   |  0 nobod[y]   |3   nobod[y]
   |there          |  4 there      |  1 there      |  1 there
Thus,
- ":set nonu nornu" means: I don't want any line numbers;
- ":set nu nornu" means: I want to see only absolute numbers;
- ":set nonu rnu" means: I want to see only relative numbers;
- ":set nu rnu" means: I want to have the best of both worlds.
-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No comments:
Post a Comment