On Sep 26, 2013 2:18 PM, "Marco" <lists@homerow.info> wrote:
>
> On 2013–09–26 Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
>
> > > Since there is little chance that an underscore will immediately follow a
> > > control sequence anyway, I don't think defining it for the entire syntax
> > file
> > > will cause any problem.
> >
> > It is very common in LaTeX math:
> >
> > \int_a^b
>
> "a" is not a control sequence.
Assuming _ is defined to be a part of a command this will incorrectly highlight _a with the same color as \int. Thus you cannot just follow that advice.
> > . Can't say anything about context though.
>
> The maths looks almost the same, it's mostly TeX anyway.
>
> > In LaTeX/TeX syntax file AFAIR _ is marked as an error outside of
> > math regions though.
>
> Not so in ConTeXt. Underscores and circumflex accents are valid
> input:
>
> \starttext
> This_is_valid %% the _ is not marked as error, correct
> So ^ is ^ this %% the ^ is marked as error, although it's valid input
> \stoptext
>
> Marco
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No comments:
Post a Comment