Re: Poll: What's good about plugin managers?

I agree with this. It comes down to freedom of choice really. I see no
reason to continue Pathogen, it too depends on git and NeoBundle does
such a better job. The others have their own places though.
On 23/03/14 16:15, Michael Hernandez wrote:
>> On Mar 23, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Bram Moolenaar <Bram@moolenaar.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> At some point Vim started supporting plugins. At that time it was fine
>> to add a plugin manually, it was a one-time thing. But now that there
>> are so many plugins and they get updated often, manually updating
>> plugins has become tedious.
>>
>> I am wondering what Vim users like about plugin managers.
>> Is there one that works best, that everybody should use?
>> Are there still features that no existing plugin manager offers?
>>
>> Vundle appears to be popular, someone mentioned it's better than
>> Pathogen. So nobody is using Pathogen?
>>
>> But then there is also NeoBundle. But not everybody has git installed
>> and it depends on that.
>>
>> And there also is vim-addon-manager. And Vimball.
>>
>> Is it fine to have a choice of plugin managers, or is this causing a
>> headache (for users and/or for plugin writers). If yes, then we should
>> pick one plugin manager and retire the others.
>>
> I think it's fine to have a choice of manager. I was using Vundle because it was so easy but I've switched to NeoBundle because it is simple like Vundle, but can handle automation of post-install tasks such as compiling a auxiliary component for you.
>
> --Mike H
>

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.