Re: Poll: What's good about plugin managers?

On 24 March 2014, Gary Johnson <garyjohn@spocom.com> wrote:
> On 2014-03-24, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 24, 2014 11:08 AM, "LCD 47" wrote:
> > >
> > > On 23 March 2014, ZyX wrote:
>
> > > > 13. Ability to list and remove unused plugins. Reason: it is
> > > > just convenient. Low priority.
> > >
> > > That would imply keeping stats about when each plugin is
> > > actually used. A complicated, expensive, and tricky task, for
> > > very little gain.
> >
> > Simplest implementation is just taking a list of currently active
> > plugins and remove everything but them. VAM/Vundle/NeoBundle have
> > everything what is necessary to perform such a task. It is not so
> > easy for FHS-based installations, but it is easy to implement if you
> > just do not provide this functionality for this task.
>
> How do you know whether or not a plugin is "actually used"?

I believe that was answered just below the text you quoted:

On 24 March 2014, Nikolay Pavlov <zyx.vim@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> And check out :scriptnames. Recording its output at VimLeave makes
> such functionality rather easy.
[...]

/lcd

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.