Re: Is there a way to incsearch with folded context

diff --git a/src/ex_getln.c b/src/ex_getln.c
--- a/src/ex_getln.c
+++ b/src/ex_getln.c
@@ -1843,6 +1843,10 @@ cmdline_changed:
validate_cursor();
end_pos = curwin->w_cursor;
curwin->w_cursor = save_pos;
+#ifdef FEAT_FOLDING
+ if (fdo_flags & FDO_SEARCH)
+ foldOpenCursor();
+#endif
}
else
end_pos = curwin->w_cursor; /* shutup gcc 4 */
On Mo, 29 Dez 2014, Gary Johnson wrote:

> On 2014-12-29, Kevin Wu wrote:
> > Gary Johnson於 2014年12月30日星期二UTC+8上午3時30分04秒寫道：
> > > On 2014-12-28, Kevin Wu wrote:
> > > > When I do searching, the cursor would jump to the first match, if
> > > > I set "incsearch".
> > > > But it's not true with folded context.
> > > > Specifically speaking, What I want to get is that when searching,
> > > > the folded context would be unfold automatically and the cursor
> > > > would jump into where the first match is, and moreover when the
> > > > cursor jump to another line, the unfolded context would be folded
> > > > again.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any way to satisfy my need?
> > >
> > > Take a look at
> > >
> > > :help 'foldopen'
> > > :help 'foldclose'
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Gary
> >
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > When I searched the solution for my issue, I found the option
> > 'foldopen', and I also had checked it, which is
> > :se fdo?
> > foldopen=block,hor,mark,percent,quickfix,search,tag,undo
> > Is it OK?
> >
> > Sorry, it's my poor English to let you misunderstand my issue.
> > After finishing a search, the cursor will jump to the first match,
> > even it's in the fold, that is OK.
> > But what I want is "incremental" search, that is, when I typing
> > the word a character by character, the cursor would jump into the
> > corresponding match instantly with automatically folding and
> > unfolding.
> > If I set "incsearch" and no fold here, everything is fine.
> > But if the 1st match is in a fold, there is no window responding,
> > just like "noincsearch".
> >
> > Is there a way to satisfy my need?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> You explained your issue well. The fault is mine. I thought that
> including "search" in 'foldopen' and setting 'foldclose' to "all"
> might do what you wanted, or be close enough, but I didn't try it
> before replying and I see now that it doesn't work for incremental
> searches. Odd. It seems to me that it should. I don't know of a
> way to do that.

Here is a patch, that will do that, if the foldopen option contains
'search'

Best,
Christian
--
Neue Meldungen von Windows 2000:
Sie beenden hiermit die aktuelle Windows Sitzung. Wollen Sie noch
ein Spiel spielen (j/n)?

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.