Re: Smarter sintax coloring

Hi Christian and Charles,

I gave quick look to the file Charles suggests and it seem doable. Thanks.

Christian, I know syntax coloring does not work as I would like. But
if you think about it, it is quite strange. I'd expected that stuff
like == vs != or != vs =! have totally different colors, I don't need
a color to say: "look there is an operator here." On the other hand a
different color to underline that there is a different operator is
useful.

Yours sincerely,
Paolo

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Christian Brabandt <cblists@256bit.org> wrote:
> Hi Paolo!
>
> On Mi, 31 Dez 2014, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
>
>> Really? No-one knows how to change the syntax coloring rules?
>
> It can probably be done, you simply need to add custom syntax rules for
> each operator and color each one directly. I have not seen such a thing,
> however (which doesn't mean anything however).
>
> Best,
> Christian
> --
> Bernd Eckenfels: gut geklaut :)
> Lutz Donnerhacke: Natürlich, auf gute Gedanken komme ich eh' nicht von allein.
>
> --
> --
> You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
> Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
> For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.