On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:46 PM, BPJ <bpj@melroch.se> wrote:
> Den 2015-10-19 kl. 18:52, skrev Paul:
>
>> For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not
>> recognized as spelling error.
>
> That's because it "is a word" (an expression which I find rather silly)
> according to major dictionaries, although labeled archaic by most of
> them.[1] For example:
>
> <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fictious>
[...]
This site is accessible only by subscription, however anyone could
read definitions for two meanings of the word (both flagged as
"obsolete") at https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fictious
Best regards,
Tony.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment