Hello,
Some plugin authors understandably require that any issue reports to be 
reproducible on a "bare-bones" vim.  But that plugin might be requiring 
a vim that has more capabilities than one started with "gvim -u none -U 
NONE".  As an example, fugitive.vim is inoperable in such a gvim, and 
silently so (no error messages).
So, in general, given a plugin, how does one determine what is the 
"bare-bones" vim it's author has assumed?
Thanks,
--Suresh
-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment