On Do, 29 Aug 2019, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> (I like the [N/M] index, but I also think the W is way too subtle, and I
> find myself looping again and again.)
When the N/M index was first introduced, it did show the error message
and forced a small delay to make sure it can be read before the N/M
index would potentially overwrite it. However people complained about
vim being unresponsive, so it was changed and the 'W' indicator was
added as a compromise.
Best,
Christian
--
Jeder Tag an dem du nicht lächelst, ist ein verlorener Tag.
-- Charlie Chaplin
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/20190829113006.GH25942%40256bit.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment