Re: improving Vim - Kickstarter - brainstorming - goals - who wants to join?

Excerpts from Paolo Bolzoni's message of Mon Nov 25 23:12:49 +0100 2013:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Nikolay Pavlov <zyx.vim@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 25, 2013 5:24 PM, "Marc Weber" <marco-oweber@gmx.de> wrote:
> > I would consider D in first place. Not that I actually worked with it, but I
> > have read lots of articles convincing me that it is way better then C++.
Do you still remember some cases why you disliked D?
Would you mind adding some comments about why you think D lacks?
http://vim-wiki.mawercer.de/wiki/vim-development/ideas/replacing-c-by.html
Trying to collect arguments..

C++11: About C++ I dislike that its a lot more verbose than eg haxe.
Example:
var m = new Hash<Int,Sting>();
^^^ and these types can even be omitted
m.set(2,"abc");

But I agree that C++(11) at least fixes the most urgent problems, it
provides typed lists/hashes/...

I also always wondered why I have to maintain .h and .c* files.
Why doesn't the compiler generate the .h files? (probably CPP #if reasons)

Marc Weber

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.