Re: using a variable in a substitute command

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:37:16PM EDT, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2021-05-19 19:16, Chris Jones wrote:
> > Now I tried to replace the "echom g:counter" command by a
> > :s(ubstitute) command, e.g.
> >
> > | :s/^# \(.*$\)/# \\textit{\=g:counter: \0}
> >
> > Unfortunately this is what I got:
> >
> > | # \textit{=g:counter: <header content>}
> > | ... i.e.
> > | # \textit{=g:counter: title of chapter #1}
> > | # \textit{=g:counter: title of chapter #2}
> > | # \textit{=g:counter: title of chapter #3}
> > | etc.
> >
> > In other words what gets substituted is (among other things) the
> > *name* of the variable NOT its contents.
>
> So close.
>
> The magic you're looking for is to *begin* your replacement with
>
> \=
>
> and everything that follows (up to the next delimiter, usually a "/")
> is evaluated as an expression. So you can do something like
>
> :s/^# \zs\(.*\)/\='\\textit{'.g:counter.': '.submatch(0).'}'
>
> (I might have the number of escaping "\"s wrong before the "textit")
>
> You can even use the filename itself (available in the "%" register)
> in that expression, something like
>
> s/^# \zs\(.*\)/\='\\textit{'.substitute(@%, 'f\(.*\).md', '\1',
> '').': '.submatch(0).'}'
>
> to capture the filename. That way, even if the buffer-list gets out
> of order, you're still pulling in the expected file-number based on
> the filename.
>
> Hope this gives you the tools you need to feel like you can dominate
> this task. :-)

Aaaah... I get it. Basically I need to make *everything* part of the
'expression' (in vimdoc parlance) that will be substituted using the
concatenation dot ('.') to build said 'expression': so that I end up
with an object that joyfully mixes literals (such as '\textit}', ': ',
and the final '}') with variables (g:counter) and the return value of
function calls (i.e. submatch(0) — should actually be submatch(1) on
second thoughts)...!

I haven't tested your solution yet but it's obvious that it is going to
work... because it could not be otherwise.

Incidentally, I had thought about grabbing the numbers in the file names
but decided against it because apart from the added difficulty I was not
sure how I would be able to get rid of the leading zeroes where relevant
(f01—f09) but I get the point: the sky's the limit where vim trickery
is concerned.

And as to doubling the textit slash it's needed because vim gobbles up
the initial 't' of 'textit' otherwise .. not sure why.

Thanks,

CJ

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/YKa22ovPDockehR7%40turki.local.