On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:27:51 AM UTC-5, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 30.07.13 06:57, Ben Fritz wrote:
> 
> > Maybe better using "very magic":
> 
> 
> 
> Everything's better with \v ;-)
> 
> 
Yes. I occasionally edit portions of my .vimrc where I didn't used it, and wonder why.
> 
> >   \v<\d+>\.@!
> 
> 
> 
> On the test line:
> 
> 
> 
> 123 123.0 123. 456 0.123 .123 789
> 
> 
The OP specifically said that valid decimals are "in the form 1.0D0, or more precisely \d\+\.\d\+D\d\+" so I didn't try stuff like "123." or ".123".
But possibly as in the other thread we need to account for negative numbers?
> 
> that regex also detects the fractional parts as integers, so it still
> 
> needs a tweak. This seems to do it:
> 
> 
> 
> /\v\.@<!<\d+>\.@!
> 
> 
Good. Even without the narrow constraints I assumed it's fairly easy to tweak to get it more correct.
For the OP, Erik added a negative look-behind (similar to the look-ahead my first response used but constraining what comes BEFORE instead). See :help /\@<!
> 
> But even that finds 06 and 57 in 06:57. Whether they are desired
> 
> integers may vary between use cases. Admittedly they'll probably only
> 
> crop up in rare strings in a fortran program.
> 
Good point...but these would be harder to guard against.
-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment