Thursday, June 12, 2014

Re: Vim and Evil compared. Documentation

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Rosangela Medeiros da Silva <rosangelamesil@gmail.com> wrote:
Evil automatic documentation is quite good. However, Vim documentation is very complete, with examples, and translations to many languages, like French and Esperanto. It is trivial to write a lisp function that inserts Vim documentation into Evil functions that are placed in the evil-commands.el file.

My question is: Is it illegal to do that, i.e., insert Vim documentation into Evil functions, so that Evil users can profit from the effort of Vim users?

You're the lawyer here ;)

If you're not going to distribute the pieces of Vim documentation, you can do anything with it. If you're going to distribute them, e.g. on your web page (which looks very thorough; good work!), you just need to follow Vim's license, which is here: <http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/uganda.html#license>. Basically it's GPL-compatible (I think version 2 but I'm not sure). Evil is licensed as GPL3, so there should be little problem (but IANAL).
 

In the mean time I am writing a tutorial that I designed for Evil users, but can be useful for Vim users too. I am updating it weekly. I will appreciate any feedback, corrections, and information about commands that work differently in Evil and Vim. The address is

advocacia.me/en/evil.html

There is also an evil.org file that can be downloaded from

advocacia.me/en/evil.org

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments: