On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:10:52AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 14.06.15 12:07, Marcin Szewczyk wrote:
> > If I have time I will look into the formatexpr (mentioned earlier) as
> > well.
> 
> A quick peek at the related help shows it can be used to throw e.g. some
> awk or perl at the problem. That could accept "12. ", while rejecting
> "2003. ", by imposing a numeric maximum. But what then when the list
> goes to "7. ", and there is "5. " in the text, unfortunately wrapped, so
> that it appears at the start of the line? Now neither strings nor
> numbers resolve the ambiguity - in any language.
I thought about exploring a possibility of using the previous line
context and a consistent style where a trailing space at the end of the
previous line means I want to continue a paragraph and not to start
another list item. Like with the "w" option of 'fo'. Then both normal
numbers and list item numbers could match the same regex.
I have no idea if such a thing is feasible, though.
-- 
Marcin Szewczyk                       http://wodny.org
mailto:Marcin.Szewczyk@wodny.borg  <- remove b / usuĊ b
xmpp:wodny@ubuntu.pl                  xmpp:wodny@jabster.pl
-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment