I have a use case where the optimal tool for my need is gvim as I don't have access to anything more suitable in the context. I am trying to invoke gvim as a process to perform a replacement (no shell or batch based invocation).
The arguments I am passing (which are simply string joined with a space) are:
string[] arguments =
{
    "-N",
    "-u",
    "NONE",
    "-i",
    "NONE",
    "-n",
    "-es",
    "-c",
    "\"%s/.*foo.*/bar/g | w\"",
    @"x:\path\to\file"
};
The replacement is performed as expected, however the return code is 1. Is that by design, or as a result of something I have done incorrectly? The facility performing the invocation checks for a non zero return code and it would be desirable for that to be the case when a genuine error has occurred.
Thanks
-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Wednesday, November 1, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment