On 10/12/2020 14.04, A. Wik wrote:
> I just like to keep things "8-bit clean". As long as all tools used
> to process the files are also 8-bit clean, nothing gets corrupted.
> Alas, it does mean files are sometimes displayed incorrectly. But in
> my experience, it gets messy when I introduce UTF-8.
Ok, my experience instead is that a lot of tools do mess up the
encodings and its hard to promptly recognize those mess-ups when not
using a UTF encoding. I guess it comes up to one's usual tools, needs
and habits.
> There is something to it. People who use only ASCII seem to like
> UTF-8 better than those who frequently use non-English characters.
> I've seen claims that UTF-8 is "compact" but compared to strictly
> 8-bit character sets like Latin-1 it is not.
Maybe that was in the first years of UTF-8, now several tests showed
that UTF-8 is fairly efficient even for asian languages, so I think it's
generally well accepted and the controversy is just on the BOM.
Anyway I don't think anyone who needs non-english characters has ever
favoured any old non-unicode encoding, Unicode is a bliss precisely for
them.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/dee925c6-31e9-4d3d-4a9d-83a1f4f20070%40tiscali.it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment