Re: [VIM] Re: [VIM] Re: vim/colorschemes: Request For Comments

Hi

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Romain Lafourcade wrote:

> @Walter Cazzola, could you do
>
> :verbose hi Normal
>
> and report back with the exact output?

I get this:
:verbose hi Normal
Normal xxx ctermfg=121 ctermbg=0 guifg=lightgreen guibg=Black font=DejaVu Sans Mono 10
Last set from /usr/share/vim/vim82/colors/murphy.vim line 14

Walter

> Le lundi 14 février 2022 à 11:03:34 UTC+1, Walter Cazzola a écrit :
>
>> Uhm, what should I notice? I'm using murphy in gvim and still I've to use
>> CSApprox to have it behaving closely in a terminal. Maybe I'm doing
>> something
>> wrong. I used vundle to install it.
>>
>> Walter
>>
>> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, Lifepillar wrote:
>>
>>> On 2022-02-12, Romain Lafourcade <romainla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> thanks to the hard work of a small but motivated team, a
>>>> first milestone is finally within reach
>>>
>>> As a mostly passive observer of the development of this project, I feel
>>> compelled to thank you for undertaking this time-consuming task with
>>> invincible passion! I can testify that it was no mean feat.
>>>
>>>> - due to the _many_ inconsistencies plaguing the originals, we generally
>>>> favored the _spirit_ to the _letter_ so the peachpuff remake (to really
>>>> pick a random example) _is not the original peachpuff_; it still retains
>>>> much of what made peachpuff peachpuff but in a much more usable and
>>>> up-to-date package.
>>>
>>> Compatibility (with terminal and GUI environments, and with Vim's own
>>> highlighting definitions) has been greatly improved. This makes the user
>>> experience so much better: to pick a random example, peachpuff used only
>>> 0-15 colors in terminals, so activating it in 256-color capable
>>> terminals would leave the user wondering why it didn't look like
>>> peachpuff (or worse, why it looked completely different in different
>>> terminals). But the number of improvements is really huge.
>>>
>>> Thanks again for setting the path forward and raising the bar for color
>>> schemes: hopefully, it will become now easier to add new ones, finally
>>> pushing forward https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/1665. Personally, I'd
>>> like to see a joint effort to produce an original and fresh color scheme
>>> created specifically for Vim (9?), in the same way as some other editors
>>> have "their own" branding color scheme. But maybe this is wishful
>>> thinking...
>>>
>>> Life.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Cazzola, PhD, Associate Professor, Computer Science, Univ. of Milano
>> caz...@di.unimi.it @w_cazzola Ph: +39 02 503 16300 HP: cazzola.di.unimi.it
>> · · · ---------------------------- · · · ---------------------------- · · ·
>> ... recursive: adjective, see recursive ...
>> · · · ---------------------------- · · · ---------------------------- · · ·
>>
>
>

--
Walter Cazzola, PhD, Associate Professor, Computer Science, Univ. of Milano
cazzola@di.unimi.it @w_cazzola Ph: +39 02 503 16300 HP: cazzola.di.unimi.it
· · · ---------------------------- · · · ---------------------------- · · ·
... recursive: adjective, see recursive ...
· · · ---------------------------- · · · ---------------------------- · · ·

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/2fab6cda-e1af-16c2-1d69-8d8086824ba%40di.unimi.it.