> On 02/05/11 01:55, Ben Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Yeah, well at that line in my syntax.txt (dated the same as yours,
>>>> IIRC--I believe I checked against a date you provided), I find
>>>
>>> Are you sure? My syntax.txt is dated April 6 (as shown on line 1),
>>
>> Nope. I mustn't have checked after all (or perhaps only naïvely checked
>> the month and not the day). Mine is dated April 1.
>>
>> Ben.
>
> Somehow the post (in 8bit Latin1) to which I'm replying here (in UTF-8) had
> "naïvely" with a correct i-diaeresis (0xEF in Latin1), but the next one (in 8bit
> UTF-8) quoted it as "naďvely" (with 0xC4 0x8F = U+010F SMALL LATIN LETTER D WITH
> CARON) then printed it correctly below the quote (0xC3 0xAF = U+00EF). I don't
> know what happened when you tried to read your own message. Maybe you tried to
> view it in ISO-8859-2 since in that encoding, 0xEF means d-caron.
Google Groups messed it up. It left here as:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
naïvely
but then arrived from the list as:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
na=C4=8Fvely
I have no idea how they could have got the conversion so wrong, when it is so
beautifully declared, but there you go. Computers! Pfff!
Ben.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment