On 2018-11-05 10:36, Matt Ackeret wrote:
> dumb suggestion on my part - use a hard link instead of a soft link?
Neither hard- nor sym- link makes a difference. At least in the case
of the symlink, vim has a hope of knowing where the destination
directory is, whereas with a hard link, it would have to scavenge the
file-system for other directories containing the same inode#.
That said, I tend to default to symlinks unless I have a compelling
reason to do otherwise. Fewer surprises when things cross
file-system boundaries.
-tim
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment