Re: Spellcheck after Ellipsis again

On 13.06.16 14:45, David Woodfall wrote:
> >Any ideas? (Other than renaming my txt files to tex)
>
> Actually, renaming doesn't work either. It seems that some things are
> still spellchecked up the top of the document. If I put an ellipsis
> near the end it's fine.
>
> Stumped...
>
> I'm sure there is a setting for how much of the buffer is checked, but
> I haven't found it yet.

When a problem just becomes more complex with additional effort, it can
sometimes be worth considering alternatives. When I try substituting a
two-dot 2/3 ellipsis, using the ^K.. digraph, vim spellchecking does not
highlight an error.

Eyeing the output of :dig, I was unable to spot a full 3-dot ellipsis,
though ^K3. and ^K3_ did produce three dots at half character height,
whatever they might be good for.

Maybe there is a suitable digraph in there somewhere, and that could be
mapped to Alt-E or whatever?

Erik

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.