Re: Spellcheck after Ellipsis again

>On 13.06.16 14:45, David Woodfall wrote:
>> >Any ideas? (Other than renaming my txt files to tex)
>>
>> Actually, renaming doesn't work either. It seems that some things are
>> still spellchecked up the top of the document. If I put an ellipsis
>> near the end it's fine.
>>
>> Stumped...
>>
>> I'm sure there is a setting for how much of the buffer is checked, but
>> I haven't found it yet.
>
>When a problem just becomes more complex with additional effort, it can
>sometimes be worth considering alternatives. When I try substituting a
>two-dot 2/3 ellipsis, using the ^K.. digraph, vim spellchecking does not
>highlight an error.
>
>Eyeing the output of :dig, I was unable to spot a full 3-dot ellipsis,
>though ^K3. and ^K3_ did produce three dots at half character height,
>whatever they might be good for.
>
>Maybe there is a suitable digraph in there somewhere, and that could be
>mapped to Alt-E or whatever?
>
>Erik
Thanks for the suggestion.

I did once use the uft8 symbol for ellipsis, but it really killed the
readability of it.


--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.