Re: A question on folds syntax definition

On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 10:54:46 AM UTC-6, Boris Danilov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Ben Fritz <fritzophrenic@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 8:16:48 AM UTC-6, Boris Danilov wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> By the way, is there a quick method to unfold 2 fold levels from
>
> >>
>
> >> bottom while keeping the rest folds unchanged?
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> > What does this mean? Are you looking for the zR/zr/zM/zm commands? See the help entry for each. (mnemonic: zr = "fold reveal" zm = "fold more")
>
>
>
> Yeah like those, but I want to fold/unfold from *bottom* while those
>
> commands do this from *top*. I want to open last one fold from behind
>
> while keeping top folds without change.
>

I still don't understand what you're trying to do. I don't know what you mean by "unfold from the bottom" vs. "unfold from the top" or what "open last one fold from behind" means.

Can you give an example of text indicating where folds are, which folds start closed, and which folds would be open after whatever command you run?

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php