Re: A question on folds syntax definition

Andy,

> And the help topic is at
> :h :syn-fold
>
> I don't know why you insist on folding by syntax, it doesn't make sense
> for your language (imho). The opening marker contained in the linewise
> comment need to extend that comment over several lines up to the closing
> marker, it's not one-line anymore.
>
> And fdm=syntax is also known to be slow.
>
> And you cannot create/delete folds with `zf', `zd' etc. but maybe that
> is intended?

The language has another kind of folds based on it's meaningful syntax
and I want to have them along with the user defined foldings. The
reason user defined folds look like '//>' and '//<' because there is
already quite enough of source code that uses that convention.

By the way, is there a quick method to unfold 2 fold levels from
bottom while keeping the rest folds unchanged?

Regards,
Boris

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php