Re: A question on folds syntax definition

Ben,

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Ben Fritz <fritzophrenic@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 10:54:46 AM UTC-6, Boris Danilov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Ben Fritz <fritzophrenic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 8:16:48 AM UTC-6, Boris Danilov wrote:
>> >> By the way, is there a quick method to unfold 2 fold levels from
>> >>
>> >> bottom while keeping the rest folds unchanged?
>> >>
>> > What does this mean? Are you looking for the zR/zr/zM/zm commands? See the help entry for each. (mnemonic: zr = "fold reveal" zm = "fold more")
>>
> Yeah like those, but I want to fold/unfold from *bottom* while those
> commands do this from *top*. I want to open last one fold from behind
> while keeping top folds without change.
>
> I still don't understand what you're trying to do. I don't know what you mean by "unfold from the bottom" vs. "unfold from the top" or what "open last one fold from behind" means.
> Can you give an example of text indicating where folds are, which folds start closed, and which folds would be open after whatever command you run?

Okay, it's been a while until I felt I could formulate my question
better. I want to open all folds that doesn't contain other folds
inside of them (or in more complex scenario to open folds that contain
at most N folds inside). I want other folds state keep unchanged.

Then, why do I need it? I want the last (in this meaning that the fold
is *last* when it doesn't contain other forlds) fold level always be
open no matter what, so that when I finally get to it I don't need to
open that. Actually I want to control it this way: open the *last*
level or close the *last* level.

Regards,
Boris

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php