On 1/19/2013 2:57 AM, ping wrote:
> with a long line like this:
>
> * this is a long line this is a long line this is a long line
> this is a long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a
> long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a
> long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a long line
> this is a long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a
> long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a long
> line
>
> gq on it give me inconsistent results, in different times when I work
> on vim (not in the same time, when its always consistent) :
>
> sometime it is (pls ignore the line#):
>
> 3 * this is a long line this is a long line this is a long
> line this is a
> 4 * long line this is a long line this is a long line this is
> a long line
> 5 * this is a long line this is a long line this is a long
> line this is a
> 6 * long line this is a long line this is a long line this is
> a long line
> 7 * this is a long line this is a long line this is a long
> line this is a
> 8 * long line this is a long line this is a long line
>
> some other time it is (pls ignore the line#):
>
> 2044 * this is a long line this is a long line this is a long line
> this is a
> 2045 long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a long
> line this is a
> 2046 long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a long
> line this is a
> 2047 long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a long
> line this is a
> 2048 long line this is a long line this is a long line this is a long
> line this is a
> 2049 long line
>
> I compared the fo , si , tw of the 2 vim instances and they are all
> the same.
> what else gives me the different results?
>
because one has paste and the other don't...
I realized this moments ago and just forgot again...have to make a note..
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment