Saturday, April 2, 2016

Re: Outlining folding rule

On 2016-04-02 15:24:20 +0000, Richard Mitchell said:

> On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 2:17:22 AM UTC-4, Nicola wrote:
>> On 2016-03-31 20:53:34 +0000, Nicola said:
>>
>>> The following foldexpr is giving me headaches because it doesn't work
>>> under all circumstances:
>>>
>>>
>>> fun! s:outlinerFoldingRule(n)
>>> return getline(a:n) =~ '^\s*:' ?
>>> \ 20 : indent(a:n) < indent(a:n+1) ?
>>> \ ('>'.(1+indent(a:n)/&l:tabstop)) : (indent(a:n)/&l:tabstop)
>>> endf
>>
>> Never mind, I've solved it. That should be <= and not <.
>> Curiously, the time it takes to find a bug is often inversely proportional
>> to how stupid the bug is.
>>
>> Nicola
>>>
>
> Wouldn't it be proportional? The stupider the bug, the longer it takes
> to find...at least mine are.

Sure, that's what I meant. Translitterate 'stupid' => 'subtle'.

Dislexia does not help, either :)

Nicola


--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments: