I just wanted confirmation that vim9 vimnew wasn't that far behind LuaJit.
And it's a good news for 2022 and futur! :)
Best wishes for Vim9 and Bram too.
NiVa
Le lundi 10 janvier 2022 à 16:49:50 UTC+1, Dominique Pelle a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:55 PM <aro...@vex.net> wrote:
> > Maybe interesting for benchmark
> > https://github.com/tjdevries/vim9jit
> >
>
> If learning Rust isn't the whole purpose of the project, you might want to
> look at Raku, specifically "grammars". It can be a language for generating
> languages.In the page https://github.com/tjdevries/vim9jit there is something not right IMO:
the section about performance uses the "sum" performance test from
https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/README_VIM9.md where luajit
is indeed much faster than vim9:| how | time in sec |Sum benchmark:
| --------| -------- |
| Vim old | 5.018541 |
| Python | 0.369598 |
| Lua | 0.078817 |
| LuaJit | 0.004245 |
| Vim new | 0.073595 |However, https://github.com/tjdevries/vim9jit omits the fact that in theother benchmark called "indent", vim9 is faster than luajit. Accordingto the same README_VIM9.md the second script might be morerepresentative of what vim scripts typically do.Indent benchmark:| how | time in sec |
| --------| -------- |
| Vim old | 0.578598 |
| Python | 0.152040 |
| Lua | 0.164917 |
| LuaJit | 0.128400 |
| Vim new | 0.079692 |In any case, it's nice to see that neovim developers are consideringsupporting Vim9 script.RegardsDominique
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/892730f3-6eb2-41bd-a4a0-f4705dc52e41n%40googlegroups.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment