Re: Improving vim startuptime

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 01:01:23PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> All of those things are possible and probably good ideas, but
> driving them all to zero would improve the time by only 656 ms and
> still leaves you with an annoying 2.1 s unaccounted for.
>
> The output of hyperfine shows only the program name. What command
> are you executing? If the command was something like this,
>
> vim -cq
>
> then I can't explain what vim could be doing from the time it
> printed "--- VIM STARTED ---" in the log until it exited.
>
> It would be interesting to see what hyperfine measures with the
> command
>
> vim -N -u NONE -i NONE -X -cq
>
I was using `hyperfine -i /usr/bin/vim`.

But I tested with above commands too.

```
$ hyperfine "vim -cq"
Benchmark 1: vim -cq
Time (mean ± σ): 2.414 s ± 0.017 s [User: 0.358 s, System: 0.048 s]
Range (min … max): 2.392 s … 2.447 s 10 runs


$ hyperfine "vim -N -u NONE -i NONE -X -cq"
Benchmark 1: vim -N -u NONE -i NONE -X -cq
Time (mean ± σ): 2.047 s ± 0.006 s [User: 0.032 s, System: 0.010 s]
Range (min … max): 2.039 s … 2.056 s 10 runs
```

--
Manas

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/mjrzfpp4mq7a7dvpoltvt4wx7pt7fv6c4tpaj7v7hvpl6uttzi%40nwkpwatcrp7q.