> This just looks like another ugly workaround, not better then using
> :redir
I never said it is not a workaround. But it is still better then using :redir for the reasons explained in the last paragraph.
I am arguing here that adding :redir support is not needed at all. Bram suggested to have function, you suggested to have function *and* :redir, I argue that *only* function should be supported. There were the reasons behind having *only* function. What are the reasons for
> But shouldn't :redir also be useable to capture all available completions?
? If somebody needs a working solution for capturing completion variants it is linked above, meaning that it is not a reason for adding :redir support.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment