Re: evaluating vim functions in search mappings

On May 13, 12:14 am, Marc Weber <marco-owe...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Excerpts from Charles Smith's message of Sun May 12 12:08:15 +0200 2013:
>
> > In order to be able to go to the next command in python, I'd like to
> > have a mapping as follows, but I can't get it to work:
>
> >   map ]0 /^\s\{0,^R=wincol()}\S^M
>
> Can you retry telling us what you mean by "next command"?


Python delineates scope merely with indentation. I mean the next
command in the same scope. So, given the python snippet (this is,
btw, no endorsement of python):

for i in f():

print i

print "done"

exit

if my cursor is on the first line (e.g. on the first char of the first
line), I want to be able to skip to print (or to exit if there were no
print)



So, I want to look for the next line that has as much white space at
the beginning as the line where the cursor currently is - or has less
white space, meaning that the section is over.

The strategy is to use \{0,x}, where x is the builtin-function
wincol(). I'm trying to use the ^R= evaluation operation but vim
complains with:

E554: Syntax error in \{...}




> Plugins like ttoc may be close.
>
> Usually using / ? searches are fastest for navigation. (eg /r n to jump
> to "for navigation")
>
> Marc Weber

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.