Re: netrw :Explore setting current buffer to hidden

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Charles E Campbell
<drchip@campbellfamily.biz> wrote:
> Justin M. Keyes wrote:
>> netrw is 11,000 (eleven thousand) lines of code without any automated
>> tests.
> That, as it turns out, is not the case. I do have automated tests for
> it. The tests are based on pchk
> (http://www.drchip.org/astronaut/vim/index.html#PCHK); however, ever
> since patch#866, there's been a problem with hanging (probalby due to a
> race condition in vim), so I haven't made the pchk-based test suite for
> netrw available.

I mean "automated" in the sense that any Vim regression would be
immediately caught. How much coverage would you estimate?

Justin M. Keyes

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.