Re: Packages

On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:43:24 AM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Matthew Desjardins wrote:
>
> > I like the current implementation, but what about "after" directories?
> > Is it just me or are those missing, too?
>
> The "after" directory is mosly useful to add your personal preferences.
> In what situation would you want to use an "after" directory in a
> package?
>

Possibly, checking the installed version of a plugin you depend on, and acting accordingly? I suppose now you could force the other plugin to load first, right?

Also for filetype plugins which *add to* existing filetypes. But of course loading the existing files with a :runtime command is probably an option.

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.