Re: how to redefine paragraphs?

On 2017-09-11 09:48, Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 6:33:56 PM UTC-5, Tony Mechelynck
> wrote:
> > • if the 'paragraphs' option is not empty, then a dot in column 1
> > immediately followed by one of the disjoint character pairs
> > making up 'paragraphs' is a paragraph start. By default, this
> > means one
> > of .IP .LP .PP .QP .P<space> .TP .HP .LI .Pp .Lp .It .pp .lp .ip .bp
>
> Is this option still actually useful to anyone today?

While I've done a the occasional groff/nroff/troff text-processing in
the last decade, it hasn't been much.

> If not, perhaps it's time to extend this option to repurpose it to
> be actually useful in the modern world?

And changing this up to allow smarter paragraph definitions
(Christian's reply just came in re regexp paragraph definitions) would
be great. I largely use either HTML (using <p> tags) or Markdown
(using blank lines) but could see it being useful when coding to have
something like "\<def \<" for Python.

-tim


--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.