On 2012–12–22 Marc Weber wrote:
> So what made you switch? If there are good reasons to prefer Vundle I'd
> like to add those to VAM's documentation so that users find it easier to
> use the best tool for teir job.
There was nothing particularly wrong with VAM which made me switch.
I changed other plugins as well. Having used both VAM and Vundle I
can conclude that both work fine for me. VAM has more features,
Vundle takes a more simplistic approach. One thing I like about
Vundle is how easy it is to add a plugin hosted on github. With VAM
I sometimes struggled to find the correct script name to provide for
the ActivateAddons call. But maybe that's just me.
> Don't you miss features such as
> - loading plugins at runtime which allows to load plugins only
> when editing specific filetypes?
Frankly speaking, no. I never used it.
> If you have had trouble with anything let us know so that we have a
> chance to fix it.
I really appreciate the concerns to improve VAM. As I said there was
nothing wrong with it which made me switch.
Marco
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment