Re: To be strange or not to be strange...?

On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote:

>
> Ben Haskell wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Ivan Krasilnikov wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 22:41, meino.cramer wrote:
>>>> And at this point one will win 1000 points for free if knowing,
>>>> how to enter the version string...
>>>>
>>>> I tried
>>>>
>>>> 7.3.001
>>>> r7.3.001 (like svn)
>>>> v7-3-001 (as used by .hg.tags)
>>>>
>>>> but without luck so far.
>>>>
>>>> What is the correct spelling here ?
>>>
>>> Type 'hg log | less' to see a list of all revisions.
>>>
>>> vim 7.3.000 is ee53a39d5896 (or 2a2ad267db08, they're the same).
>>>
>>
>> The hg tags stop at v7-2-235 in my version of the repo, and the last
>> log message for .hgtags is:
>>
>> changeset: 2029:875230a0a1bf
>> user: convert-repo
>> date: Wed Jan 06 14:58:09 2010 +0000
>> summary: update tags
>>
>> That makes me think they were only carried over from SVN. Bram, when
>> you push new patches, are you no longer adding the tags? It would be
>> beneficial. Having to inspect/grep the logs is a pretty poor
>> substitute for being able to do:
>>
>> $ hg co v7-3-000
>
> I haven't looked into this yet. Is there a simple way to apply a tag
> to a specific hg changeset version, so that you can check out that
> version by that tag?
>

$ hg tag -r [revision] [name]

e.g. the Vim 7.3.000 candidate(s?) named above
$ hg tag -r ee53a39d5896 v7-3-000
$ hg tag -r 2a2ad267db08 v7-3-000

--
Best,
Ben

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php