> Lately I've been using the Ex commands :d, :t, :m to shuffle text around
> while editing. Since the syntax of those commands require the source
> *and* destination lines, e.g.:
>
> :100copy150
>
> to copy line 100 below line 150, I wonder why my cursors is *moved* to
> line 150 after the command.
>
> I tend to use those Ex commands precisely to avoid having to navigate to
> the line I want to move. But then I end up having to navigate back to where
> I was before I entered the command.
And, annoyingly, such a movement doesn't count as a jump, and you can't
get back to where you were with ''
Is that a bug, perhaps?
Ben.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment