Re: A word remains highlighted even though it's in the "add" list

On Nov 18, 8:53 am, Eric Weir <eew...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Jean-Rene David wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > * Eric Weir [2011.11.16 07:40]:
> >>   I have a word in a document that remains highlighted as after I've done
> >>   zg. I've verified that the word is in the "add" list. Also the [s and ]s
> >>   commands do not move the cursor to the word. When I try them I get a
> >>   "search hit TOP, continuing at BOTTOM" or "search hit BOTTOM, continuing
> >>   at TOP" message.
> >>   What's going on?
>
> > A few things to check:
>
> >   - does it remain highlighted if you do either one of:
> >      :set nospell
> >      :set nohls
> >      :syn off
>
> >   - do other words behave like that? what's
> >     special about this one, that you can see?
>
> >   - what does :set ft? say?
>
> Thanks, Jean-Rene. I apologize for the delay in responding. Busy with other things.
>
> nospell and nohls have no effect.
>
> syn off causes the highlighting to disappear.
>
> ft is vimwiki.
>

Where did you get the vimwiki filetype/syntax plugins? It doesn't
appear to be distributed with Vim.

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php