Re: Different line width for different syntax groups

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Michal Kawalec <michal@bazzle.me> wrote:
> Excerpts from Ben Fritz's message of 2013-10-25 14:50:15 +0100:
>> Not syntax groups, but rather patterns defined by the 'comments' option, can be treated differently.
>>
>> Do "setlocal formatoptions-=t formatoptions+=c" to only allow textwidth to apply automatically to comments, assuming your 'comments' option is set appropriately to the syntax you are editing.
>
> This doesn't really help me in this particular case, as the text I want
> to exclude from beight width-limited is a member of a markdownCodeBlock
> syntax group and is not a comment.
>
> It is a good setting to know about, thanks for telling me about it :)
>

The 'comments' option doesn't necessarily need to correspond to a real
comment. It's only used by automatic formatting rules. So if you're
able to define a region using the 'comments' option that reflects the
same region as a markdownCodeBlock syntax group would mark, then you
would still be able to use this.

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.