> Saluton pansz :)
> pansz <p...@routon.com> skribis:
>> open-source software != free-as-in-freedom software.
>> Vim is open-source, but it is not free-as-in-freedom software.
> I don't want to start a flamewar on this issue
There won't be a flamewar on this issue: I'm just saying that some
distribution developers choose not to include vim by default and the
freedom is their reason.
I don't care whether vim should be include in a particular distribution
or not. Because I always compile vim from svn, which is far more useful
than distribution-specific versions.
IMO most serious vim users should compile their own vim. Only casual
users should rely on distribution-specific version.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment