> by default. Having tried a few of these, I have found the NERD
> Commenter plugin to be the most extensive and widely used,
While I basically agree with the intent of your post, I'd suggest to
include a much slimmer plugin that reuses the comment definitions that
are already defined in ftplugins (&comments, &commentstring) and a
plugin that doesn't require users to patch the plugin's code in order
to add support for a new language.
IMHO vim's standard runtime already includes a few bloated (ft)?
plugins that tend to be rather cumbersome for people who don't enjoy
their feature set & implementation.
And while we are at it, instead of including more stuff in the
standard runtime, maybe the process of installing them later on should
be simplified. XEmacs provides a way to install libraries right from
XEmacs. You get a list of available libraries, select those you want
and they get downloaded & installed. This is a really cool way to
handle this and makes discussions of what plugins to include in the
standard runtime obsolete. There already are a few efforts going on in
that direction. Maybe those projects should be promoted. Easier
integration with linux packaging systems would help too.
Regard,
Tom
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment