It seemed that you are very careful, As I have mentioned before, TxtBrowser
is
not enough smart. I remembered I had mentioned a example:
References from my response before
|
|Thank you very for your advice. This is the 1st time I increase my weight
by
|1.1 kilogram.
The plugin would recognize it as a title, but it isn't. I have no clues
about
how to differentiate bewteen those except that vim know it's meaning. The
only
way to avoid to make a mistake is to cancel the highlight the word in the
apostrophes. But when you obtain the precise, you will lose some highlight
when
it should be. Vim is an open world, I hope I provide a possiblity for
everyone
to custimize his own syntax highlight, I hope you custimize what the syntax
is defined and share your configuration. I'm not good at regular expression
indeed. Of course I will do some study and think about the possibility.:-)
Any
clue is welcome.
Thank you very much. Please let me know if you have any question or
suggestion.
Chris Jones-44 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:34:24AM EST, vimer_at_cn wrote:
>
>> I change the plugin name to "TxtBrowser" to reflect its original name
>> and add some new features:
>
> Sounds like a good idea - text.vim was just too generic to be safe or
> even useful.
>
> But see below.
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/show-the-document%27s-structure-and-syntax-highlight-of-plain-text-tp27095084p27436694.html
Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment