> I do think that a negative rating is useful.
It is - but not in the current shape.
If you give a negative rating its ok - but you should
- allow the author to remedy the issue
- force users dowvoting scripts to leave a message
Its ok to downvote for a reason such as "contains executable".
But its bad to have people provide negative rating and not knowing why!
The website should allow some minimal feedback.
> I have manually deleted the sequence of -1 ratings for script 2905.
> Not a thing that we should need to do often.
You're right: In open source malicious downvoting does not happen often
or should not. I've checked it: I can no longer access HTTP access logs.
Bram: do you still know when you changed the voting system using POST?
Then we can confirm what happened to Dr Charles Campbell's scripts.
Marc Weber
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment