Re: suggest: Ruby 1.9 in VIM 7.3 by default

Это конечно хорошо, но нафига это нужно. или пропатчить бету
официально так трудно?

On Jun 10, 7:29 am, Sergey Khorev <sergey.kho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:28 PM, George V. Reilly <geo...@reilly.org> wrote:
>
> > I tried building Vim with Ruby 1.9 on Windows a few weeks ago. Unlike
> > Ruby 1.8, it simply wasn't possible with the MSVC compiler, because
> > 1.9 came with include files and libs for MinGW only.
> > Vim can be built with either MSVC or MinGW, but the official Windows
> > builds have always been built with MSVC.
> > It'd certainly be nice to have Ruby 1.9 be the default.
>
> I believe build onhttp://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/requires
> MSVC 6.0 (ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org//pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/ruby-1.9.1-p376-i3...).

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php