On Aug 30, 2013 9:34 PM, "Chris Lott" <chris@chrislott.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Francis Ngoh <yfngoh@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Im away from my computer but I found a workaround ... ie dont use numbered
> > registers for the macro.
>
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how this solves the
> problem. dt" isn't using a numbered register, it's deleting to the
> character "
Numbered registers are populated from deletes unless another register was specified. The help states though that one-line deletes should not affect numbered registers (with some exceptions, but "t" is not the one).
> c
> --
> Chris Lott <chris@chrislott.org>
>
> --
> --
> You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
> Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
> For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No comments:
Post a Comment